Tuesday, July 20, 2010

TMTV small print

With the school summer holidays messing up the morning schedules I spent this morning flicking through the TV guide just to see what was on and landed on a channel called TMTV and a programme called Early Bird, hmm? I popped up the info and got "Remember the Early Bird catches the worm" what's this?

Turning to the channel I was presented with a young women in her lingerie, a pair of stockings, and a pair of high heeled shoes; holding a phone. Ah one of those channels. A nice big premium rate number to call and an exhortation to turn up the volume as "Girl speaking now" which is an amusing lie as they just play music and you're supposed to call-in at least according to the small print. And that's what held my interest (the girl not being my type).

Now I have a 1080 32" widescreen TV which means vertically the screen measures 40cm. The number to call took up a 3cm height that's 84px, the small print took up 0.5cm that's 14px. 14px of anti-aliased text scrolling past. Now the text itself was legible just about, but the numbers listed certainly weren't. Now this isn't an HD channel my TV blows up the 576 input to 1080. So imagine a TV of the same vertical dimension, the text will take up exactly the same amount of height - the big number will still be 3cm high the small text 0.5cm however they'll be made up of less pixels. For the small print it'll be 8px. However that assumes an SD widescreen TV; make it a normal 4:3 and put it into letter box and the text will appear a little under 4mm high and be made up of just 6px.

It's difficult to emulate on a computer due to the differences in resolution, however a close approximation for a 576, 720 and 1080 screen would appear as follows.

Resize the image so it appears at a height of 0.5cm on your screen imagine it scrolling past and you get an idea of just how blurry this is. Oh and yes for some reason the middle 720 is the clearest, go figure.

Now interestingly the ITC has a standard for advertising in that text can be no smaller than 12 scanlines (pixels) high and suggests 16 for widescreen broadcasts. That means the text is just at the minimum height recommended by the ITC. Talk about cutting it close.

Just as a laugh I looked up their terms and conditions. via a Google link that bypasses the entire "Are you over 18?" screen. Oh look the information here differs to that provided on the TV. Calls cost £1.50/min - check; calls to voice short numbers also cost £1.50/min - nope, the TV said £2.00/min. Pics cost £3.00 charged at two £1.50 reverse-charged calls - nope, the TV said £4.50 via three calls.

So you look up the T&C online because you can't read it on the TV screen and get different information - neat; I wonder if Ofcom or the DTI would be interested?

4 comments:

Walkerno5 said...

Never mind the advertising Flip, how many pixels per boob?

Not that I would know, but there is one on channel 960 on Sky that is a looped advert for phone lines rather than a live show, and the women on it are quite the ugliest things i've seen on a television since Bernard Manning.

Orphi said...

Bernard Manning? Oh my god. Sky girls, you have been cussed! :-D

FlipC said...

"how many pixels per boob?" For this particular lady quite a few, if you follow the link and the pictures button (NSFW) I believe it was Fernanda Dark three rows down and three across, in this photo you can even make out the tan-line she was sporting on TV. Difficult to tell from this, but on screen her hair looked like a wig, just seemed an unnatural heft to it.

That said and with your BM remark there are a couple of women shown here I wouldn't object to meeting, bet they rarely feature on the show though. Of course seeing them in real lighting outside the confines of a glamour shoot is likely to be totally different.

Ah ha your mention of that Sky channel reminds of Babestation and lo unlike the TMTV site they have a stream that displays the scrolling banner at the bottom

http://www.babestation.tv/on-tv

You see how small that text is how jerky the scrolling is, now imagine that at a lower quality. Gods this must be so cheap to make or raking in so much money as apparently they're on channels 94,95,96,97, and 99. Why not 98 because that's our old friend TMTV.

Oh yeah gotta love delving into the small print. TMTV is a part of Bang Media (London) Ltd with no website who is not to be confused with Bang Media, London who have the crappy website.

Babestation although stating its T&Cs are based in California and comply with USC Codes have Threeways Productions listed, who do have their own website where they seem proud of their offerings. Their Live Shows include three Psychic ones, four phone chat ones and one phone-in 'game'. I'm not posting the link because there's some hardcore stuff there.

Gosh I bet their mums are so proud of them

Orphi said...

“if you follow the link and the pictures button (NSFW)”

Oh, I see. Is that why Trend Micro AV keeps freaking out every time I click anything on your blog?

Oh well, hopefully nobody monitors the event logs... o_O